Dead Bang Guns & Automatics
Call 843-716-0511 Email Neal | Loris, South Carolina

NEW LISTINGS FOR BROWNING SHOTGUN SALE
save yourself hundreds of dollars

What don't you understand about this picture?

Help-the Mentally Retarded Liberals and RINOS
Gun Control 1 - Gun Control 2 - History for Dummies

• HOME
Our Policy's

SALES ON NEW GUNS
• New Gun Listings

GUN COURSES
• Gun Range Info

FOR GLOCKS ONLY
OFF-SITE LINKS

• New Recoil Reduction Rods
TESTIMONIALS

Wal Mart's Policy on
Concealed Handguns

McCain & Other Info

SHIPPING ALERT!
SAVE MONEY ON GUN SHIPMENTS

AMBULANCE FOR SALE
(YOU HEARD RIGHT
AMBULANCE FOR SALE)

• Articles/2A Info

• Class III Info (NFA)

• HALL OF SHAME
Colt, S&W, T/C, Walther
Wholesalers

website by
Neal & Melissa

GUN CONFISCATION STARTED THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION
or History for Dummies

The War Begins British troops, sent to confiscate American arms and supplies, were resisted by Massachusetts militiamen at Lexington and Concord on April 19, 1775. This broadside printed at Salem, Massachusetts, a few days later dramatically displays the coffins of the forty Americans killed. The British were reported to have suffered 65 dead, 180 wounded, and 27 missing.
http://www.rjohara.net/gen/wars/revolution.html

Massachusetts Colony was a hotbed of sedition in the spring of 1775. Preparations for conflict with the Royal authority had been underway throughout the winter with the production of arms and munitions, the training of militia (including the minutemen), and the organization of defenses. In April, General Thomas Gage, military governor of Massachusetts decided to counter these moves by sending a force out of Boston to confiscate weapons stored in the village of Concord and capture patriot leaders Samuel Adams and John Hancock reported to be staying in the village of Lexington. ... http://www.eyewitnesstohistory.com/lexington.htm

The War Begins -- British troops, sent to confiscate American arms and supplies, were resisted by Massachusetts militiamen at Lexington and Concord on April 19, 1775. ... http://www.loc.gov/exhibits/british/brit-2.html

"The 2A never has meant 'Jack-spit' about bird hunting or target shooting. Such leftist babble was disingenuous, duplicitous and an outrage to defend the indefensible. The fact is the 2A was specifically intended to provide American citizens with the tools necessary to rise up and overthrow an abusive government. It was written by men who had just done that very thing.

The first 3 battles of the American Revolution were not about taxation, or representation, or even the list of grievances delineated in the Declaration of Independence ... the first 3 battles of the War for Independence were over gun control. [read: Lexington 1775] When Captain Parker faced off the British on the Green in Lexington it was to prevent the British from confiscating "power and ball".

It was again Thomas Jefferson who said, "The strongest reason for people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themsleves against tyranny in government."

back to topback to top

OH BY THE WAY:

DOJ Concludes 2nd Amend. Secures Individual Right:
Conclusion For the foregoing reasons, we conclude that the Second Amendment secures an individual right to keep and to bear arms. Current case law leaves open and unsettled the question of whose right is secured by the Amendment. Although we do not address the scope of the right, our examination of the original meaning of the Amendment provides extensive reasons to conclude that the Second Amendment secures an individual right, and no persuasive basis for either the collective-right or quasi-collective-right views. The text of the Amendment's operative clause, setting out a "right of the people to keep and bear Arms," is clear and is reinforced by the Constitution's structure.

The Amendment's prefatory clause, properly understood, is fully consistent with this interpretation. The broader history of the Anglo-American right of individuals to have and use arms, from England's Revolution of 1688-1689 to the ratification of the Second Amendment a hundred years later, leads to the same conclusion. Finally, the first hundred years of interpretations of the Amendment, and especially the commentaries and case law in the pre-Civil War period closest to the Amendment's ratification, confirm what the text and history of the Second Amendment require.

Here is their conclusion and you can read the complete memo at: http://www.usdoj.gov/olc/secondamendment2.htm

The wire service press release:
http://releases.usnewswire.com/GetRelease.asp?id=40899

AN INDIVIDUAL RIGHT by Geoff Metcalf, 12/24/04

AN INDIVIDUAL RIGHT By Geoff Metcalf December 24, 2004 NewsWithViews.com

"The beauty of the second amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it." --Thomas Jefferson

Guess what? The Second Amendment, ("A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.") has, does, and will secure "an individual right to keep and bear arms."

You knew that. I knew that. However, a cabal of leftists remains in denial over what even their own Constitutional scholar had concluded.

Notwithstanding the itching and moaning and gnashing of teeth from the left wing radical fringe, it is an empirical fact that our God given inalienable right to keep and bear arms is FACT.

The U.S. Department of Justice's Office of Legal Counsel has officially concluded the Second Amendment "secures an individual right to keep and bear arms." Duh!

Despite having been dated Aug. 24, the 93-page document was just released. 'Someone' delayed the release for apparent political reasons. This is passing strange considering even liberal democrats acknowledge one of the key components that cost Al Gore his presidential dream was his having embraced the Chuck Schumer/Diane Fienstein/Babs Boxer anti-gun mantra.

The belatedly released research notes, "examination of the original meaning of the Amendment provides extensive reasons to conclude that the Second Amendment secures an individual right, and no persuasive basis for either the collective-right or quasi-collective-right views."

As Second Amendment Foundation founder Alan M. Gottlieb observed, "Henceforth, all Americans will know that the claim by anti-gunners that the Amendment only protects some mythical right of the states to form militias and National Guard units is an outright fraud."

Please note the 'allegedly unbiased' mainstream hasn't said "Jack" about this epiphany.

Even, liberal darling and Harvard Constitutional Law Professor Laurence Tribe acknowledged the obvious in 1999 (and again the mainstream media silence was deafening).

Tribe is arguably the most influential living American constitutional scholar. In 1999 he concluded, "the federal government may not disarm individual citizens without some unusually strong justification."

Tribe confirmed it includes an individual right, "admittedly of uncertain scope," to "possess and use firearms in the defense of themselves and their homes."

The personification of the Metcalf Bromide of "Some people just don't want to be confused with FACTS that contradict their preconceived opinions or prejudices." Is, and has been, the ant-gun crowd.

In 2002 when a legal brief was filed by the Justice Department declaring that this protection extends to an individual's right to keep and bear arms irrespective of their involvement in a state militia the gun control crowd threw a hissy fit. Sonic wedgie time: "The worst fears about Attorney General Ashcroft have come true: His extreme ideology on guns has now become government policy." said Mike Barnes, president of the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence.

Despite his extensive liberal bona fides, Tribe (begrudgingly and belatedly) concluded that the Constitution ensured to each American a right to "possess and use firearms in defense of themselves and their homes."

The Second Amendment never has meant 'Jack-spit' about bird hunting or target shooting. Such leftist babble was disingenuous, duplicitous and an outrage to defend the indefensible.

The fact is the Second Amendment was specifically intended to provide American citizens with the tools necessary to rise up and overthrow an abusive government. It was written by men who had just done that very thing.

The first three battles of the American Revolution were not about taxation, or representation, or even the list of grievances delineated in the Declaration of Independence....the first three battles of the War for Independence were over gun control. [read: Lexington 1775] When Captain Parker faced off the British on the Green in Lexington it was to prevent the British from confiscating "power and ball".

"There should be no doubt," Gottlieb concluded, "that those who have campaigned for restrictive gun laws or outright gun bans have been working to rob Americans of a constitutional right, a civil right. The time has come for America to re-examine every restrictive federal and state firearms statute, every local ordinance and every regulation, and start erasing those that were written solely to infringe on the rights of individual, law-abiding citizens to peaceably own firearms of their choice, without ever again having to explain why." Despite his righteous indignation, I hope Alan isn't holding his breath.

It was again Thomas Jefferson who said, "The strongest reason for people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themsleves against tyranny in government."

"Geoff Metcalf is a nationally syndicated radio talk show host for TALK AMERICA and a veteran media performer. He has had an eclectic professional background covering a wide spectrum of radio, television, magazine, and newspapers. A former Green Beret and retired Army officer he is in great demand as a speaker.

AMEN
AMEN
Help a Liberal Series
Gun Control for Dummies (Liberals) Part 1 Gun Control for Dummies Part 1 Hell Glock Gun Control for Dummies Part 2
history for Dummies (Liberals) History for Dummies

AMERICA THE BEAUTIFUL

 
On A Rock in Rural Iowa

There is a huge rock near a gravel pit on Hwy. 25 in rural Iowa. For generations, kids have painted slogans, names, and obscenities on this rock, changing it's character many times. A few months back, the rock received it's latest paint job, and since then it has been left completely undisturbed. Painted by Ray "Bubba" Sorensen II.

Click Here for more views of Freedom*Rock!

 

back to topback to top